子机构
400-600-1123
logo
备考资讯 提分课程 答疑社区
登录
注册
题库解析   >   推理题 题型   >  
本题由lindy提供

According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin, the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about

11,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era, can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who were ancestors of modern Native Americans. However, anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them. Nor were extinctions confined to large animals: small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption. Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. Still, Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere. But, according to historian Richard White, even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence. White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them; yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago.

Which of the following is true about Martin's theory, as

that theory is described in the passage?

    A. It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.
    B. It denies that the Pleistocene species extinctions were caused by climate change.
    C. It uses as evidence the fact that humans have produced local extinctions in other situations.
    D. It attempts to address the controversy over the date of human arrival in North America.
    E. It admits the possibility that factors other than the arrival of humans played a role in the Pleistocene extinctions.

登录申友雷哥GMAT,查看答案及解析

视频解析

暂无视频解析,点击获取更多视频内容

文字解析

答案:
B
逻辑简图:
第一层:PM的观点:人类造成extinction 第二层:SK进行反对,并提出了自己的观点 第三层:RW对PM和SK进行评价,并提出自己的evidence A. It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.(未提及) B. It denies that the Pleistocene species extinctions were caused by climate change. C. It uses as evidence the fact that humans have produced local extinctions in other Situations.(未提及) D. It attempts to address the controversy over the date of human arrival in North America.(未提及) E. It admits the possibility that factors other than the arrival of humans played a role in the Pleistocene extinctions.(未提及) 推理题:结合第一层和第二层的内容。

GMAT会员

提交
OG视频
申友雷哥GMAT小助手

添加官方小助手微信
了解更多GMAT考试与咨询

100蜜糖购买当前课程

当前蜜糖数:颗 去获取

立即购买 取消购买

吉祥物小蜜蜂

关注公众号

公众号

扫码关注申友雷哥GMAT公众号

立即获取12GGMAT核心资料

微信咨询

申友在线咨询二维码图片

扫码添加申友雷哥GMAT官方助手

立即咨询GMAT网课面授课程

联系申友雷哥 全国免费咨询热线:400-600-1123

Copyright © 2021 All Right Reserved 申友雷哥教育 版权所有 沪ICP备17005516号-3 免责声明 互联网经营许可证编号:沪B2-20210282